|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 12:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Noir it seems are a profoundly untrustworthy merc alliance.
Having two conflicting contracts running. Breaking the confidence of one by discussing their contract with their enemy. Podding their client for fun. Trying extort money for a really **** poor job.
I think I missed alot but needless to say they have a unique way of doing business. I would have no trouble in recommending them for some one else to use (at their own risk of course). |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 15:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Isabela Valentine wrote: Yes you are right Joseph
'There was no stipulation in the contract that we were not allowed to shoot Lemmings. Besides, nothing was stopping you guys from actually fleeting up your 450 pilots to take on our 20. Don't be mad because you guys came across a slight bit of adversity.' No conflict of interest there then.
'No details of the contract were forwarded to the original contractor, nor was the name ever given. ' Wierd the goons knew all about it. I think you must have some goons spies in your organisation or you blabbed. Whatever!
'Podding their client for fun. ' 'Not our fault ' - I know. However I would have thought blowing up your client would be bad for business. Oh wait you want paying for that?
'Trying extort money for a really **** poor job. ' 'I look forward to the coming weeks. See you on the battlefield. Or maybe not. Up to you guys.' - So not trying to extort money from a dissatistisfied client.
'Not our fault that Goblin has an alt in Lemmings after he said he was cutting ties with them. ' So why would I be seeing you if the Lemmings have nothing to do with Gevlon?
It's a big mess of Noirs making isn't it :) See you soon then.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 19:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Turbo Badass Reloaded wrote:First, you stated that you asked the first contract if this was alright with them, I'm assuming that is because you saw that it could be a conflict of interest you would assume wrong Our main BJ contract explicity had us attacking Goons during suicide ganks. I just did a quick courtesy check for a repeat client to make sure going after the Goons more aggressively (as Goblin wanted) wouldn't bother him. It didn't, he seemed pretty enthused about it actually. Goblin's initial offer for an ECM jamming contract was declined (I'd never have accepted such a pointless contract because I understand suicide ganking mechanics from having fought CFC in Jita twice before). The counter offer of 2m/catalyst, 5m Brutix, 10m Talos, and 20% the value of the pods was accepted. This is clearly seen in the mails. Unless you're implying Goblin wanted us to jam pods to death? EDIT: Gevlon Goblin has taken to blocking my responses to comment questions on that blog post. Should say it all really.
Now me not being an expert like Alek here but 'Our main BJ contract explicity had us attacking Goons during suicide ganks'. So you being allied with them you had to wait till they went criminal correct? So you being able to jam them would mean concorde would swiftly finish them off with no more damage to the goons target. How long does it take an interceptor to finish off a battlecruiser I think its more than 5-6 seconds so all you really did was ***** on kills. Well done Noir :)
I repeat 'Our main BJ contract explicity had us attacking Goons during suicide ganks'. Your delusional, the best way to stop a suicide gank is to ECM the attacker and let concorde finish them off not using interceptors. That is why YOU suggest using EAF in the mails.
Gevlon 'The plan would be to NOT be at war with Goons, forming up in Scorpions and Blackbirds and jamming out Goon Taloses and Brutixes when they go GCC, spoiling their ganks. '
Alek 'I'll accept a bounty contract on Goon suicide gankers but Scorps and BB's are a bit pedestrian for us. Much prefer to do things with EAF and be more mobile.'
From you own emails! EAF Electronic Attack Frigate Not Scorpions and blackbirds but .... kitsune. Unless you had another electronic attack frigate in mind I love to know which :) |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 20:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Full quote: Quote:I'll accept a bounty contract on Goon suicide gankers but Scorps and BB's are a bit pedestrian for us. Much prefer to do things with EAF and be more mobile. But we do things a little differently as you know ;p As in ways that work. Attempting to jam a target after it's already fired in a .9 is pointless, especially Tornados/Talos/Brutix. Using AF/Interceptor teams to hit them at their safe spots you lower their ability to get setup and their max alpha. You're also fast enough to follow them around allowing you to trigger kill rights before they shoot further reducing their damage and ability to coordinate fire. And finally using inties you have a much higher chance of chasing and catching their pods after the gank which adds massively to the cost of the gank (Catalysts are 2m and given out for free, pods cost 20, 30, even 40m to replace and come out of the pilots wallet) Goons started suicide ganking our frigate fleets to keep us off them. They left Gevlon's Orca untouched throughout the whole event. Lemmings didnt try to ECM anything. So out of those three methods, the one which caused Goons to change their strategy and spend resources to stop, the one which they ignored, and the one you're talking about which even your own alliance didnt use, which one do you think works best? Again, 1900 dead CFC. 25B worth. Pew.
I had to switch to an alt to ecm as some mercs were shooting lemmings so I WAS ecming quite well thank you. Also were there three contracts because on your podcast at about the 38th minute you state the you had a contact to shoot the guys shooting goons. So doesn't that make three contracts? 1.The 'main' one shooting goons 2.Gevlons contract 3.and the one 'shooting the guys' shooting goonswarm contract (38 min on the podcast)
So you stating you were going to use EAF as opposed to Blackbirds and scorpions in the contract negotiations was never going to happen and that you were just stringing him along for what purpose exactly? Also you seem to have ignored your main contract 'Our main BJ contract explicity had us attacking Goons during suicide ganks' because 'Attempting to jam a target after it's already fired in a .9 is pointless' even more so is firing on them |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 20:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Wrathful Penguins wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:http://noirmercs.com/content.php?3455-Burn-Goblin
The full story, complete with mail dumps from Goblin. You scam mercs you dont get privacy, you get the sunlight.
Also confirmed I am some guy in Noir. Clearly the contracts were not conflicting. If you want exclusive service you put that in your contract and you pay for it.
Minute 38 of the podcast Two contract 1. Shoot Goons 2. Shoot guys shooting guying
You can't see a conflict?
Minute 38 of the podcast 'Neither employer seeing this as a conflict of interest?' Alek - 'No' (However only one knew about the other) |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 20:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Double Post. |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 21:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kaea Astridsson wrote:Entity A says, shoot B for us would ya? Entity C says, shoot A pretty please.
Only entity here I see that could argue conflict would be A, which it seems in this case was OK with it. Turned out C just didn't like B getting shot and never chose to mention that part prior to dealings.
Just my take from reading both sides. Either way, BJ3 was a ton o fun.
I respect your opinion however wouldn't it have been better to inform BOTH clients potential conflict of interest rather than just one? Also it would have been better that when the question of a conflict of interest arose on the podcast that he told the truth as opposed to lying. It is just my opinion that your leaders tried to act 'clever' by playing two sides against each other to get more isk. Trying to be clever with your contracts doesn't seem a good way to maintain a reputation built on trust. I'm sure future clients will read your contracts and think what scam could Noir pull on them. This is my last word on the matter. Since your leadership seems to think they have been hard done by I expect to see you in the next couple of weeks to come. Apparently they have decided B and C more closely linked than they previously thought. Lol.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 09:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ok sorry about this just another inconsistency with Noir 'contracts' they may want to plug. I don't know how anyboby in Noir knew what to shoot so the shoot everything was probably best.
Isabela Valentine wrote: 'No details of the contract were forwarded to the original contractor, nor was the name ever given. The only thing passed on was that we would be shooting them too. A Burn Everyone type of deal. They seemed cool with it....'
and later Alekseyev Karrde wrote: '1 and 3 is the same contract. I know this is very difficult to follow, but we got hired BY THE SAME PERSON to shoot ganking CFCers
AND
wait for it
AND shoot people war decing GSF. At the same time. Like one after the other after the other. All weekend.'
So according to Isabela they contacted the original client to ask if they could shoot them too which according to Alek was already the original contract? 'A burn everyone type of deal' so to speak but didn't Alek state it was that already? 'They seemed cool with it....' - I bet they were it was according to less than truthful Alek was the original contract.
Also 'that we would be shooting them too'. Who is them, Alek tells us that them is 'CFCers' so Noir was working for the goons maybe?
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 12:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Isabela Valentine wrote:You poor thing Joseph. Reading comprehension lvl 1 is not a long train. I highly recommend it.
Has Scamming Lvl5 always been required for Noir memembership or is it just a new thing? |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 14:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Isabela Valentine wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:Isabela Valentine wrote:You poor thing Joseph. Reading comprehension lvl 1 is not a long train. I highly recommend it. Has Scamming Lvl5 always been required for Noir memembership or is it just a new thing? How do you scam someone who refused to pay you? I mean, it's fairly obvious that at best Goblin has a "not satisfactory" complaint. It looks a lot more like "Goblin tried to scam Noir, got caught and is now kicking up a smokescreen". Also, if we had scamming trained to lvl 5 we would have taken the money BEFORE "scamming" him. News flash, we didn't scam him and he's just being upset about it. Either way, no one cares. Gevlon can try to find our Titan but anyone who bothers will just be wasting their time. Everyone who is spectating, eating their buttery popcorn, and wearing their ugly 3D glasses will enjoy the show. The best is still to come ;)
Never said you were good scammers. Btw no one cares about your little titan so relax :).
'The best is still to come' - You actually manage to scam someone using your dodge contracts or is it the old dual client scam? I must admit I'm intrigued. :) |
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 19:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Van Ishez wrote:Don't really know whether all this happened due to poor communication or intentional misunderstandings.
In real life there are multiple occasions where the customer asks for something, but in reality wants something else. Now if they go to court they will look at the contract and see that the customer wanted A and got A, clear case.
However an old saying is that an unhappy customer will tell about his experience to 10 people, a happy customer will tell about his experience to one person.
In real life, (eve may differ?) it's not about following or not following the contract, it's about making customers happy. Edit: And yes, sometimes making the customer happy requires almost psychic skills....
They knew he wasn't happy on Friday 25.04.14
From: Gevlon Goblin Sent: 2014.04.25 11:31 To: Alekseyev Karrde,
Hi,
War: Darwins Lemmings vs. Goonswarm Federation War: The Marmite Collective vs. Goonswarm Federation
I see you in both of the wars as ally to the Goons. What the hell is going on? We were negotiating a contract against Goons. I thought such double-crossing clients is bad for business. I really hope it was just an act of a rogue director.
Nothing psychic about it he was set up.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 21:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Reppyk wrote:I
Noir. : - revealed the contract too (never, ever do that, even if the customer did it first) ; - made a shady deal with the target (allying against Lemmings, really ? there is no excuse) ; I am too lazy (and I don't give much of a ****, too) to check the KBs, if there was good faith running the contract or not.
I'm throwing virtual poo at both of you. -We didn't reveal the contract till Goblin went off the handle declaring he would not pay and blocking (literally in game, not allowed to contact him at all) any attempt to discuss the issue. At that point he's a scammer not a customer and is being treated accordingly -We didn't make any deals with the target(s). I would agree with you 1000% Reppy if either of those things were the case. I've been in the biz over 8 years, I know what not to do. You should check the kb ;) In good faith to both clients we put CFC through hell.
Nice freighter kill on your killboard https://zkillboard.com/kill/38430399/
and funny how you include Gevlon as part of the CFC? https://zkillboard.com/kill/38423392/ https://zkillboard.com/kill/38426611/ https://zkillboard.com/kill/38426617/ https://zkillboard.com/kill/38437902/ https://zkillboard.com/kill/38440467/
Yea great job!
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 05:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
Clenz wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Reppyk wrote:I
Noir. : - revealed the contract too (never, ever do that, even if the customer did it first) ; - made a shady deal with the target (allying against Lemmings, really ? there is no excuse) ; I am too lazy (and I don't give much of a ****, too) to check the KBs, if there was good faith running the contract or not.
I'm throwing virtual poo at both of you. -We didn't reveal the contract till Goblin went off the handle declaring he would not pay and blocking (literally in game, not allowed to contact him at all) any attempt to discuss the issue. At that point he's a scammer not a customer and is being treated accordingly -We didn't make any deals with the target(s). I would agree with you 1000% Reppy if either of those things were the case. I've been in the biz over 8 years, I know what not to do. You should check the kb ;) In good faith to both clients we put CFC through hell. Nice freighter kill on your killboard https://zkillboard.com/kill/38430399/and funny how you include Gevlon as part of the CFC? https://zkillboard.com/kill/38423392/https://zkillboard.com/kill/38426611/https://zkillboard.com/kill/38426617/https://zkillboard.com/kill/38437902/https://zkillboard.com/kill/38440467/Yea great job! That Freighter went suspect looting a wreck, who would NOT shoot a suspect freighter? Additionally, notice there are no goons on that kill mail. To the best of my knowledge, there was no arrangement made to only shoot goons. TBH we did not even know that was Gevlon's alt. Again, to my knowledge, there was no stipulation on not attacking anyone else other then the goons. What we knew was that Gevlon cut his ties from "leading" Lemmings quite a while ago and that they should be treated as any other merc group. Every other contract we are instructed on who is friendly, who to group with, what to not do, ect. Why should this one be different? I think the problem is a lot of people see Gevlon as still being the leader of the Lemmings, we do not. We see them as just another "mercenary" group. During our last contract with Galvon, he was VERY, EXTREMELY, AMAZINGLY Specific on what he did and did not want us to do. Who was blue, who to fleet with, how to take the screenshots he wanted, how many POCOs to hit a day, when to attack, when not to attack. Why would we not expect the same this time around?
To shoot ones employer once is a misfortune To shoot him twice looks like carelessness To shoot him a third time is ...... To shoot him a fourth times is .....
and then to want paying for shooting him :)
Didn't know he was his association with the Lemminings? Didn't know he didn't want you working for the cfc forces?
??? From: Gevlon Goblin Sent: 2014.04.25 11:31 To: Alekseyev Karrde,
Hi,
War: Darwins Lemmings vs. Goonswarm Federation War: The Marmite Collective vs. Goonswarm Federation
I see you in both of the wars as ally to the Goons. What the hell is going on? We were negotiating a contract against Goons. I thought such double-crossing clients is bad for business. I really hope it was just an act of a rogue director.
Received Friday 25th, before Jita really got started. Before you repeatedly targeted his 'Goblin' character. |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
11
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 14:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
Clenz wrote:The important timestamp is the one where Gevlon decided to cut off communication from us.
Actually your thinking of the one he sent a day later.
But the point is even though you knew the client was very unhappy you continued on regardless even though your client expressed serious concern at pretty much the beginning of burn jita. Why did you do that?
'At that point, who would not shoot a valid war target, as well as, someone who is refusing to pay for his contract?' So just to clarify you knew you were shooting Gevlon then dispite the earlier denials?
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 19:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Isabela Valentine wrote:At the end of the day no ***** were given. Agree or disagree, things are being perceived differently by everyone. Both sides feel slighted and a bunch of random people stating that they won't hire us in the future won't change anything. Guess what? You guys werent going to hire use anyways so it doesnt matter. In fact, we're still fulfilling contracts even after this "incident". All involviing happy clients. Noir has been completing contracts for years and it will continue to complete contracts. I'll just leave this here.
Lol Hope you run your POCO's better than you were being mercenaries. Good luck with your new venture :) |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 13:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:What can I say about NOIR.
Consistent, intelligent, trustworthy.
Just a great continuation of an already solid relationship.
+1 would hire again.
Saying they are trustworthy is going a bit far isn't it when they look at their clients contract and think to themselves how can we screw our client. Just because your enemies didn't want to pay Noir to attack your allies or that you had the good foresight to include a non aggression clause in your contract for for allies (which I'm sure there grateful for btw) doesn't make Noir trustworthy.
'+1 would hire again.' - Its like playing Russian roulette isn't it :)
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 17:22:00 -
[17] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:
Saying they are trustworthy is going a bit far isn't it when they look at their clients contract and think to themselves how can we screw our client. Just because your enemies didn't want to pay Noir to attack your allies or that you had the good foresight to include a non aggression clause in your contract for for allies (which I'm sure there grateful for btw) doesn't make Noir trustworthy.
'+1 would hire again.' - Its like playing Russian roulette isn't it :)
My post was in reference to a contract completely separate from an issue that I don't give a f*ck about. Please continue with your tears though.
You and Noir seem well suited at least.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 08:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
Is there any proof that's actually Goblin's twitter? looks like a fake account to me. [/quote]
If I were CCP I'd probably being looking for a player/group of players who were actually in Iceland at fanfest 2014 and who had a grudge against Gevlon. Know any?
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:If I were CCP I'd probably being looking for a player/group of players who were actually in Iceland at fanfest 2014 and who had a grudge against Gevlon. Don't you agree Alek? so basically everyone who attends fanfest who has two braincells and realises how much of a complete numpty gevlon is? you're not exactly shortlisting here.
Are you actually trying to excuses for the perpetrators. Shame on you Dave!
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
George Boothe wrote:Like many others I have followed this thread for mere entertainment purposes. From what I have read in this thread I can understand the view of both sides and though I must say that I think the little Goblins might have been going a bit overboard with their reactions. But so far the disussion was (for eve standards) extremely civilised and actually brought forth valid points from both sides. And so far as someone who has had nothing to do with either side I did not see any need to put my opinion in the ring. However: Joseph Soprano wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Is there any proof that's actually Goblin's twitter? looks like a fake account to me.
If I were CCP I'd probably being looking for a player/group of players who were actually in Iceland at fanfest 2014 and who had a grudge against Gevlon. Don't you agree Alek? Defacing the eve monument in the way that happened is not only a criminal act but also a **** in the face of the eve community as a whole. Insinuating that Noir. had anything to do with it to frame gevlon without any evidence in that direction is, in my opinion, the lowest blow on the eve forums I have seen so far. I mean, seriously? Are real life crime accusations really in order here? In a discussion of "who shot whom and was that ok?" Giving false leads and wrongful (and wild) accusations slows down the process of actually finding the guy who did this to the monument. If anybody knows anything that could help CCP in that matter, contact them and do not throw crime accusations around the forums please.
Its funny how when someone made a direct accusation (most definitely false) that Gevlon had something to do with it you were perfectly ok with that weren't you. No post about that. You didn't need evidence for that did you. You may wish to add something about that in your original post might you.
However I didn't insinuate Noir had anything to do with it. I pointed out the Gevlon wasn't at fanfest so couldn't have defaced the momument and the 'twitter account that looks kind of fake' is most definitely fake. Stop reading stuff like a Noir contract making stuff up please.
|
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Joseph Soprano wrote:George Boothe wrote:Like many others I have followed this thread for mere entertainment purposes. From what I have read in this thread I can understand the view of both sides and though I must say that I think the little Goblins might have been going a bit overboard with their reactions. But so far the disussion was (for eve standards) extremely civilised and actually brought forth valid points from both sides. And so far as someone who has had nothing to do with either side I did not see any need to put my opinion in the ring. However: Joseph Soprano wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Is there any proof that's actually Goblin's twitter? looks like a fake account to me.
If I were CCP I'd probably being looking for a player/group of players who were actually in Iceland at fanfest 2014 and who had a grudge against Gevlon. Don't you agree Alek? Defacing the eve monument in the way that happened is not only a criminal act but also a **** in the face of the eve community as a whole. Insinuating that Noir. had anything to do with it to frame gevlon without any evidence in that direction is, in my opinion, the lowest blow on the eve forums I have seen so far. I mean, seriously? Are real life crime accusations really in order here? In a discussion of "who shot whom and was that ok?" Giving false leads and wrongful (and wild) accusations slows down the process of actually finding the guy who did this to the monument. If anybody knows anything that could help CCP in that matter, contact them and do not throw crime accusations around the forums please. Its funny how when someone made a direct accusation (most definitely false) that Gevlon had something to do with it you were perfectly ok with that weren't you. No post about that. You didn't need evidence for that did you. You may wish to add something about that in your original post might you. However I didn't insinuate Noir had anything to do with it. I pointed out the Gevlon wasn't at fanfest so couldn't have defaced the momument and the 'twitter account that looks kind of fake' is most definitely fake. Stop reading stuff like a Noir contract making stuff up that isn't there please.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
24
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 06:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: .....And with that we're done with Goblin.
Personally I was expecting something a bit more after all Noir's 'I'm going to get you' talk. I guess they settled for some POCO's nobody wanted instead.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 15:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote: .....And with that we're done with Goblin.
Personally I was expecting something a bit more after all Noir's 'I'm going to get you' talk. I guess they settled for some POCO's nobody wanted instead. If you didn't want them, why did you have them in the first place?
I never had them, never wanted them. Apparently neither did Noir. I think they just like grinding structures.
Got to admit they certainly scammed RvB. Salutes to Noir for that they seem to be getting better :). |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
26
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 22:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Valentine Wiggin Wiggin wrote:I have never been a fan of NOIR. or Aleks, but the fact that sperging goblin is so mad at them for not being his personal anti-goon pets makes me want to hire them on a regular basis. Bravo chaps.
Hire Noir on a regular basis . You really should seek help for those masochistic tendencies.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
26
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 07:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
Voyager Arran wrote:Counterpoint: nobody cares what Lemmings have to think about anything.
Counter Counterpoint : Don't care!
But back on topic shouldn't you be thanking Noir for the great job they did during burn jita?
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
26
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 07:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Gin Alley wrote:The tl;dr is no one cares. The community doesnt care, Noir. will go one doing what they do for years, goons will go on doing what they do. You will continue raging and analyzing killboards for an ever shrinking audience of people that really only ever wanted to read about grinding isk.
Hint: nobody cares about killboards or ratios in the year of our lord 2014 except lowsec pirates. Maybe try paying them to do something?
Noir got paid by their other client whose contract they followed apparently. I think they cancelled Gevlons contract on the Friday when he complained about it.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
26
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 07:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:shouldn't you be thanking Noir for the great job they did during burn jita?
shouldn't gevlon?
No.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
30
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 10:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:I think so, more rumours, more assumptions, and not a single fact in sight.
On Friday the mail was recieved by Noir saying the contract was not as agreed. On Saturday Noir was going round saying they had been scammed by Gevlon and were repeatedly ganking him. So when would you say the contract ended? |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
30
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:So when would you say the contract ended? on the day shown in the evidence.
So we agree it ended on Friday then when Noir was contacted. Good to know  |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
30
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Terminus Calamity wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:I think so, more rumours, more assumptions, and not a single fact in sight. On Friday the mail was recieved by Noir saying the contract was not as agreed. On Saturday Noir was going round saying they had been scammed by Gevlon and were repeatedly ganking him. So when would you say the contract ended? Where is the proof? Here Is proof that Noir. On Tuesday said that Gevlon scammed them, after attempts to contact him had been blocked at each attempt. If you can prove that on "Saturday" or before Tuesday Noir. was calling Gevlon a scammer please provide it. And believe me or not I did not know that it was Gevlons alt, we killed that character so many times because it was a wartarget and on grid with us.
|
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
30
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:43:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Terminus, why arn't you following me on Twitter? #Questfor700
Yes Joseph as you can see from the mails posted from the very beginning Goblin said he would not be paying what he owed and blocking us as we tried to talk to him. This went on till Tues where we made the call this was no misunderstanding he was just breaking contract. Welcome to like a week ago...
If Gobs had a legit concern he'd have talked to me about it. If he wasnt comfortable doing that for whaetever reason he would have tried to involve the Merc Contracts Channel mods to arbitrate (which I tried to do on our end, obviously they didnt have much success bringing Goblin to the table either). That he didn't pretty much tells you all you need to know.
On Saturday you started crying in twitter, in jita, in the mercs channel and just about everywhere about Gevlon scamming you. It is obvious it was not a misunderstanding.
I posted a compliant about Noir in the Mercs channel forum post about Noir scamming nothing seems to have come of it. I'm sure they are investigating as I speak, ok perhaps not .
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 13:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
Loved the drunken podcast with the goon. A bit much on the butthurt though. I suppose being drunk helps when you hire Noir.
PS. You forgot to mention the 20billion bounty on your titanic |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 13:42:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Oshia Launay wrote: I have this insatiable urge to stand up against double talk, hypocrisy and more generally dishonesty.
Then you're on the wrong side. Gobbo tried to scam Noir, got caught, and you for whatever reason can't see through the smokescreen smear campaign he's got going with his rodent minions.
Just how did he scam Noir. He has even put up 20 billion for their titan as a gesture of goodwill towards Noir. |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 15:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:I'm sure they are shaking with fear. That's just another sign of Gevlon's peasantry. 20B for people to find and kill a titan that may or may not exist and if it does will be protected by a POS and a formidable mercenary corp? That's just not going to happen. Nobody is going to go through that much effort for chump change.
I don't really care whether they are shaking with fear or not. The 20 billion isk bounty was a reply to the false scam allegations which Noir was/is trying to spread about Gevlon. You already should know that Lucas.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:38:00 -
[35] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Can we stop talking about this now?
Of course WE can your participation is not mandatory. |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:20:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Lol, what false allegations? Noir said he didn't pay, Gevlon has admitted this. Gevlon has even admitted that they did work he should have paid for but didn't.
Even bigger Lol. Gevlon doesn't pay scammers and he didn't pay Noir.
'what false allegations' The ones Noir was spreading after Gevlon sent the mail on Friday. Why do you think Noir continued on with the supposed contract even after openly saying Gevlon had scammed them?
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 22:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Joseph Soprano wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Lol, what false allegations? Noir said he didn't pay, Gevlon has admitted this. Gevlon has even admitted that they did work he should have paid for but didn't. Even bigger Lol. Gevlon doesn't pay scammers and he didn't pay Noir. 'what false allegations' The ones Noir was spreading after Gevlon sent the mail on Friday. Why do you think Noir continued on with the supposed contract even after openly saying Gevlon had scammed them? They continued killing everyone in Jita because it was fun. If anyone scammed anyone here, Gevlon scammed Noir, since he got them to do a contract, then outright refused to pay. I know that's hard for you to accept since he's your leader and you have to suck up to him and all that, but that's just the way it goes buddy. Noir made no false allegations, they made very factual statements about Gevlon's refusal to pay.
Can you and Noir get your stories straight please Alek says Gevlons nothing to do with Darwin's lemming and now he's my heroic leader. Once you and Alek get your stories straight please tell me because I really need to know. Oh wait I might be 'Gob's alt in the Lemming holding corp' according to Alek , who knows or cares?
Well I would really expect you to say Gevlon wasn't scammed you being a trustworthy goon and all that however just plain ignoring the discussions about using eaf and ecm just makes you look a bit dumb. Saying Gevlon scammed them to save a pittance makes you look even dumber.
' they made very factual statements about Gevlon's refusal to pay' - he refused to pay because Noir had misrepresented what they would be doing in the contract and failed to mention that they would be allying with the goons who were the target of his contract. He was also much surprised that Noir had been hired by an element of the cfc without his permission. Gevlon had valid reasons for not paying and the scam excuse presented by Noir is laughable.
Yes I'm afraid despite what Noir's goon friend says Gevlon was set up and scammed by Noir.
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
32
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 22:46:00 -
[38] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: both parties have agreed were the facts, are false.
By both parties I assume you mean Noir and yourself!
|

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
36
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 17:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:As long as Gob continues to pretend we/I was "out to get him from the beginning" there's really no point in continuing to talk about any of it tbh.
Gob scammed, Gob got caught. Gob tried to smear his victim to get away with it, Gob got caught. Gob thought it wouldn't have consequences, Noir. took away 4 months of his life.
We've been transparent throughout the entire process, defending against Goblin's accusations with raw info including his own words. His own blogging admits that he owes us money but he refuses to pay it because of an increasingly elaborate set of excuses ranging from "they were protecting Goons" to "Alek is Erotica 1." We have tried contacting him multiple times to negotiate with him including involving the Merc Contract channel mods to arbitrate and inviting Gevlon on Declarations of War (as well as Legacy of a Capsuleer or EVE Radio to be released shortly) all of which he has ignored or declined.
From our POV it's over. Nothing will change Goblin's mind, we've already inflicted an appropriate penalty for his actions, and he doesn't seem to care about repairing his reputation. I doubt anyone will kill our titan any time soon and if they did, I strongly doubt it will be because of Goblin's "bounty" since the whole incident spawned out of him refusing to pay bounties in the first place. He and his readers/pets can continue to bleat but the story is pretty much played out and I expect anyone who cares about it has made up their mind one way or the other how to interpret events.
As we've said, if you think and behave like Goblin did/does we are as uninterested in having you as a client as you are hiring us.
That's one of the worst apologies I have ever seen. They say confession is good for the soul. Give it a go Alek. |

Joseph Soprano
Darwins Lemmings Holding Darwins Lemmings
37
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 22:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lol. It looks like a fun reality tv show about a typical American family.
I didn't know Noir not only scammed but have a ginger phobia as well. Noir's Ginger Prejudice
|
|
|
|
|